EVIL INC wrote:Actually, I have not once ever trolled on this site.
<blink blink>
EVIL INC wrote:
I came into the thread to try to contribute and offer an olive branch of peace to you by trying to offer what little help or advice I could. I do not hold grudges and was hoping that you would see the post for what it was.
I do see this post for what it was:
My requirements:
s_o_r_r_o_w wrote:Anyone know of a set of rules for modern day zombie combat? Please try to avoid just listing the title--I'm really looking for some input with a little background in the game behind it. I know about the Mongoose line based on Battlefield Evolution already. If you've played it, your opinion/review would be helpful.
That said--if you've heard of a game, but never played it, you may as well post about it anyway.
Ideally, the game I'm looking for has a zombie horde on one side, and either a platoon sized element on the other, or even something as small as a single fireteam. Options for a milspec game AND for a cheerleader with a baseball bat style game would be awesome.
Links appreciated!!
To summarize in list form:
1. Modern
2. Zombie
3. More than just a title
3a. Specially interested in more on Mongoose's game
4. Prefer zombie horde
4b. Prefer platoon sized element; Fireteam acceptable
4c. Prefer game that allows for milspec + civilians
5. Links
Your response:
EVIL INC wrote:it's been a while but I think necromunda had scenarios for that sort of thing. Of course, thats not modern though it is it?
If your not worried about balence or "fairness" (lol, its zombie hordes, who cares about FAIR lol), it should be fairly easy to improvise any modern warfare game to suit your needs. Sit down with your fellow gamers and a variety of rule systems and hash out something for yourselves that you can all agree on.
Good luck.
Test "Necromunda":
1. Not modern (fail)
2. Not zombie based, but there are zombies, maybe, somewhere (no score)
3. Just a title. No details. (fail)
3b. NA
4. No zombie horde (fail)
4b. No platoon (fail); Squad based, but you didn't eexplain that, and I already knew it (no score)
4c. Not milspec (fail); Not civilians (fail)
5. No links (fail)
Therefore, your post was useless and unproductive. It did not add anything to the discussion. It was, as I stated above, a net 0 contribution. And I'm being nice there, because I REALLY think that it actually detracted from the discussion.
EVIL INC wrote:
My apologies for trying to make nice and for not having the exact knowledge you were looking for.
Don't be sorry for "trying to make nice". Be sorry for trolling in here following the BTD discussion. Be sorry for not having the sense to say NOTHING rather than contribute a pointless and irrelevant post. Those are things you should be sorry for.
I'd love it, as would many here, if you would cut all the crap and just be a member. Contribute, disagree, whatever--but stop trolling. I'd accept your olive branch or whatever if I thought you were genuinely not being deliberately irritating.
EVIL INC wrote:
I know that many of my students are super zombie-pocolypse crazy and would love to try it out.
Aren't you laid off?
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=104802#p208785
EVIL INC wrote:Dont forget your chainsaw.
I keep it next to the Mossberg 500.