I think it's all relative, Shane.Shane wrote:I don't particularly care for the "Your rating is lower, you ship first clause" If a person has a rating of 50 or better without any bad refs, I usually go simultaneous even though mine is a hundred. I trade, maybe 10 times a year, another may trade that many times in a month.
I've been using that "rule" for a long time. I was the first to actually have it in my sig line, in fact. I'm a huge proponent of it.
That said, I sometimes ignore it entirely.
You, for example, would easily get a simul-ship with me. No problem. You've earned it.
It might end up with you shipping first, simply because I can only ship on Saturdays... but the thought is there. ; )
Someone with a 50? Depends.
if I've traded with them before or they're a recognized name for me, I might simul-ship. If there have ever been any problems with them, or I just don't know them, I'd probably ask them to ship first.
See, I know that I'm going to do everything right or, if I screw up, MAKE IT right. Someone who's only had 25 trades hasn't really established that kind of undeniable reputation, IMO. KWIM?
I mean, we see it all the time. People with ratings that high & higher ship and pack like crap or do something wrong, and it ends up with a complaint. So, nobody is immune to screwing up, but those with higher ratings have proven themselves more.
Make no mistake. I hold myself to the same standards & limitations. If I trade with Porkuslime or, really, anyone whose rep exceeds mine at all, I offer to ship first. By now, of course, I've earned enough respect as a trader that most don't hold to it... but I don't begrudge them that. They've earned it.
Eric