(Repost from TGN): Verdict from GW vs. CHS

Anything else.. come on in, and pull up a seat.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Linrandir ( 108 )
Site Admin
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Hidden deep in the Webway
Contact:

(Repost from TGN): Verdict from GW vs. CHS

Post by Linrandir » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:32 pm

Hey all! I just saw this over on Tabletop Gaming News and thought it merited a cross-post here.

http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2013/06/18/74763/
Bell of Lost Souls has posted up the verdict regarding the court case between Games Workshop and Chapterhouse Studio.

From the post:

Breaking down the counts along the different categories we have:

Copyright Claims
160 claims alleged against CHS
-GW won on 1/3 of the claims, including items such as CHS’ Powerfists
-CHS won on 2/3 of the claims, including the use of the underlying shape and size of GW Shoulderpads.

General Trademark Claims
9 claims alleged against CHS
-CHS won all 9 claims, including either no infringement, or fair use of the GW trademarks on CHS’ website.

Disputed Trademark Claims
21 disputed trademark claims alleged against CHS
CHS won 11 claims
GW won 10 claims

GW Trademarks ruled “Previously Used in Commerce” Claims
61 claims alleged against CHS
CHS won 35 claims
GW won 27

Notable Trends and Individual Products Under Dispute
CHS lost on some individual products including:
-Doomseer
-Dark Elf Arch Tortress

CHS won on some individual products including:
-Jetbike
-Super-heavy walker model
-Lizard Ogre

Damages Awarded:
CHS ordered to pay GW damages of $25,000 USD

Both sides may appeal the ruling.

Thoughts and Implications:
It’s looking like however CHS as an entity comes out of this ruling, the implications for the 3rd party industry are profound.

-The ruling of no infringement for the use of the underlying shape and size of GW shoulderpads is now on the legal record.
-Possibly more important is not guilty verdicts on the use of GW trademarks and terms on the CHS website.
-While certain CHS products themselves may disappear from the Earth in the aftermath of this case, it looks like the verdict may have provided a clear blueprint for the 3rd party accessory bits market. One that allows legal use of certain GW trademarks and terms in a way that goes way beyond what Nottingham themselves ever wished to allow.
Let the speculation begin...
New to Bartertown?
Read These Now!
Got ripped off?
Read This First!

Administrative Transparency: Anything you write me can and will be made public should I deem it necessary. Anything I write to you? Same deal. Fair is fair.

My Official Admin Messages have the :rulez: icon in front.

User avatar
tordeck ( 226 )
Expert Trader
Posts: 503
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:57 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: (Repost from TGN): Verdict from GW vs. CHS

Post by tordeck » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:12 pm

Score one for the little guy?
Buying or Trading, Lower Rating Ships First.
I Trade within the United States only.
I use and accept USPS Money Orders only for payments.

The Dark City

User avatar
3eland ( 66 )
Token Canadian
Posts: 3084
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: (Repost from TGN): Verdict from GW vs. CHS

Post by 3eland » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:22 am

tordeck wrote:Score one for the little guy?
They still have to pay 25,000... that sucks
Maybe even court fees?
~Ryan~
I'm like superman, but without the super.

The rules for Bartertown can be found here: viewtopic.php?f=44&t=45470
Helpful guide for sending packages to Canada: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=123125

User avatar
kturock ( 566 )
2014 Painting Challenge Champion!
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:55 am
Location: wpb., florida

Re: (Repost from TGN): Verdict from GW vs. CHS

Post by kturock » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:50 am

Usually on a split decision, the fess are split. Each paying they're own lawyers.
Heh, I was called a Grognard. ;-)
MY ALWAYS TRADE LIST: Scar Weaver, wmeredith, bloodstrike, tionas, wetstone, Frank Austin, akum, SW-DABOSS, Galador, nahatley, Joeb, Squeakula, mongse, con-fusion, basaint, jugglingfool, IsaiahTheBarbarian, Purple40k, Standard of War, BA-Best .

USPS Postal Inspectors: 1-877-876-2455
USPS complaint center delivery problem, lost mail, track & confirm, etc. 1-800-275-8777

User avatar
Linrandir ( 108 )
Site Admin
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Hidden deep in the Webway
Contact:

Re: (Repost from TGN): Verdict from GW vs. CHS

Post by Linrandir » Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:06 am

Also it seems that the legal firm representing CHS did so pro bono, which is well within the price range of "For Free."

I'd imagine GW's legal firm did not do them the same favor.
New to Bartertown?
Read These Now!
Got ripped off?
Read This First!

Administrative Transparency: Anything you write me can and will be made public should I deem it necessary. Anything I write to you? Same deal. Fair is fair.

My Official Admin Messages have the :rulez: icon in front.

User avatar
MagickalMemories ( 794 )
Lord Logorrheic!
Posts: 15796
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO - USA

Re: (Repost from TGN): Verdict from GW vs. CHS

Post by MagickalMemories » Thu Jun 20, 2013 3:44 am

This is the jury verdict and not the judge's ruling. He still has to go over everything and make sure it's all correct. Anything the jury ruled on could be changed. Same for the $ amount, I believe.
No worries on that amount. Nick's already talking about running a Kickstarter, and I'm planning to help a little.
The $25K isn't bad, when GW was asking for $400K.

So far, I wouldn't call it "Score 1 for the little guy." I'd call it more like "Score 2/3 for little guys everywhere" (in the after-market, custom sculpted bits market).

Eric
Lower rating? You ship first.

Give me a sense of humor Lord. Give me the grace to see a joke.
To get some humor out of life and pass it on to other folk.


I think what this situation needs is some imagination.

"...I'm a nerd, and I'm here tonight to stand up for the rights of other nerds.” – Gilbert Lowell

Want my help with a BTR or backout? All messages sent/posted should be in CHRONOLOGICAL order. Otherwise, I just won't read it.

Post Reply

Return to “Bartertown Cafe and Coffee”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests